Skip to main content
Log in

Integration of Health Coaches in a Whole Health Team Model of Chronic Pain Care: a Qualitative Study

  • Original Research: Qualitative Research
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

Health coaching has shown promise in helping patients manage their chronic disease and in improving health outcomes, yet the implementation of health coaching in healthcare systems is understudied. Further, evidence suggests that interdisciplinary care teams may be more effective in treating chronic pain than usual care. As such, we sought to examine the benefits and drawbacks to embedding health coaches within interdisciplinary pain care teams (“Whole Health Teams”).

Design

As part of a multisite clinical trial (at five Veterans Health Administration sites) investigating the effectiveness of a Whole Health Team (WHT) approach to care for patients with chronic pain, qualitative interviews gathered data on how the experience of treating patients in the WHT differed from the experience treating patients outside the WHT, as well as provider experiences coordinating patient care within the WHT.

Participants

Twenty-two WHT members, study investigators, and study coordinators.

Approach

Data were analyzed using a rapid analysis approach.

Results

Overall, stakeholders perceived considerable synergy within the interdisciplinary pain care team. Each provider brought a different perspective to the patient’s health concerns, which stakeholders felt was valuable and increased patient progress towards goals. The team model was also viewed as efficient because everyone was committed to working together and communicating as a team. Logistically, however, stakeholders noted challenges to working as a team, especially regarding patient goal setting. Furthermore, multiple stakeholders believed the care team model required a high degree of dedication to teamwork and communication among its members to be successful.

Conclusions

Embedding health coaches within interdisciplinary pain care teams may improve care processes and accelerate patient progress. Successful implementation would require adequate training, role clarification, and expectation setting to facilitate good communication across all care team members. Additional research is needed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of integrating health coaches on WHTs versus other implementation approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. Chronic diseases in America. 2022. https://www.cdc.gov/chronicdisease/resources/infographic/chronic-diseases.htm. Accessed June 15, 2023.

  2. Buttorff C, Ruder T, Bauman M. Multiple chronic conditions in the United States. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2017. https://www.rand.org/pubs/tools/TL221.html. Accessed June 15, 2023.

  3. Liddy C, Blazkho V, Mill K. Challenges of self-management when living with multiple chronic conditions: systematic review of the qualitative literature. Can Fam Physician. 2014;60(12):1123-1133.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Schillinger D, Piette J, Grumbach K, et al. Closing the loop: physician communication with diabetic patients who have low health literacy. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163(1):83-90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kivela K, Elo S, Kyngas H, Kaariainen M. The effects of health coaching on adult patients with chronic diseases: a systematic review. Patient Educ Couns. 2014.

  6. Gierisch JM, Hughes JM, Edelman D, et al. The effectiveness of health coaching. VA ESP Project #09–010. 2017.

  7. Long H, Howells K, Peters S, Blakemore A. Does health coaching improve health‐related quality of life and reduce hospital admissions in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease? A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Br J Health Psychol. 2019;24(3):515-546.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Denneson LM, Trevino AY, Kenyon EA, Ono SS, Pfeiffer PN, Dobscha SK. Health coaching to enhance psychological well-being among veterans with suicidal ideation: a pilot study. J Gen Intern Med. 2019;34(2):192-194.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Denneson LM, Ono SS, Trevino AY, Kenyon E, Dobscha SK. The applicability of self-determination theory to health coaching: a qualitative analysis of patient experiences. Coach Int J Theory Res Pract. 2019; 13(2):163-175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. National board for health and wellness coaching. https://nbhwc.org/. Accessed June 15, 2023.

  11. Wolever RQ, Jordan M, Lawson K, Moore M. Advancing a new evidence-based professional in health care: job task analysis for health and wellness coaches. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016;16:205-208.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Krejci LP, Carter K, Gaudet T. Whole health: the vision and implementation of personalized, proactive, patient-driven health care for veterans. Med Care. 2014;52(12 Suppl 5):5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. U.S. Department Of Veterans Affairs. Whole health. https://www.va.gov/wholehealth/. Accessed June 15, 2023.

  14. Connell NB, Prathivadi P, Lorenz KA, et al. Teaming in interdisciplinary chronic pain management interventions in primary care: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. J Gen Intern Med. 2022;37(6):1501-1512.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Seal KH, Becker WC, Murphy JL, et al. Whole health options and pain education (wHOPE): a pragmatic trial comparing whole health team vs primary care group education to promote nonpharmacological strategies to improve pain, functioning, and quality of life in Veterans—Rationale, methods, and implementation. Pain Med. 2020;21(Supplement_2):S91-S99.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Hamilton AB. Qualitative methods in rapid turn-around health services research. VA HSR&D Cyberseminar. 2013. https://www.hsrd.research.va.gov/for_researchers/cyber_seminars/archives/video_archive.cfm?SessionID=780. Accessed June 15, 2023.

  17. Hamilton AB. Rapid qualitative analysis: updates/developments. VA HSR&D Cyberseminar. 2020. https://www.hsrd.research.va.gov/for_researchers/cyber_seminars/archives/video_archive.cfm?SessionID=3846. Accessed June 15, 2023.

  18. Palinkas LA, Mendon SJ, Hamilton AB. Innovations in mixed methods evaluations. Annu Rev Public Health. 2019;40:423-442.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Vindrola-Padros C, Johnson GA. Rapid techniques in qualitative research: a critical review of the literature. Qual Health Res. 2020;30(10):1596-1604.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Taylor B, Henshall C, Kenyon S, Litchfield I, Greenfield S. Can rapid approaches to qualitative analysis deliver timely, valid findings to clinical leaders? A mixed methods study comparing rapid and thematic analysis. BMJ Open. 2018;8(10):e019993-019993.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Ngo V, Hammer H, Bodenheimer T. Health coaching in the teamlet model: a case study. J Gen Intern Med. 2010;25:1375-1378.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Liddy C, Johnston S, Nash K, Ward N, Irving H. Health coaching in primary care: a feasibility model for diabetes care. BMC Fam Pract. 2014;15:1-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. National Research Council. Enhancing the effectiveness of team science. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Fiscella K, Mauksch L, Bodenheimer T, Salas E. Improving care teams' functioning: recommendations from team science. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2017;43(7):361-368.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Patterson BJ, Solimeo SL, Stewart KR, Rosenthal GE, Kaboli PJ, Lund BC. Perceptions of pharmacists' integration into patient-centered medical home teams. Res Soc Adm Pharm. 2015;11(1):85-95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Wolever RQ, Dreusicke M, Fikkan J, et al. Integrative health coaching for patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized clinical trial. Diabetes Educ. 2010;36(4):629-639.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This manuscript is a product of the NIH-DoD-VA Pain Management Collaboratory. For more information about the Collaboratory, visit https://painmanagementcollaboratory.org. The work was also supported with resources and the use of facilities in the Veterans Health Administration.

Funding

Research reported in this publication was made possible by Grant Number U24 AT009769 and cooperative agreement UH3AT009765 from the National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH), and the Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences Research (OBSSR).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lauren M. Denneson PhD.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors have no conflicts to report.

Disclaimer

Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views or policy of the NCCIH, OBSSR, the National Institutes of Health, the Department of Veterans Affairs, or the United States Government.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Denneson, L.M., Purcell, N., McGrath, S.L. et al. Integration of Health Coaches in a Whole Health Team Model of Chronic Pain Care: a Qualitative Study. J GEN INTERN MED 38, 3574–3580 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-023-08317-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-023-08317-x

KEY WORDS

Navigation